ɫ̳

Skip to content
FILE - In this Thursday, Feb.  7, 2013, file photo, U.S. Postal Service letter carrier, Jamesa Euler, delivers mail, in Atlanta. The financially struggling Postal Service is seeking a 3-cent increase in the cost of mailing a letter, bringing the price of a first-class stamp to 49 cents. (AP Photo/David Goldman, File)
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

Re “Should abortion be left to the states?” (April 21):

Although Rafael Perez makes a compelling argument for abortion rights being a federal issue, he overlooks a crucial distinction.

If it is nationally mandated, one way or the other, it is the federal government taking sides. And that would unnecessarily alienate roughly half of the population.

If left to the states, the opportunity for all philosophies is maintained. If a state bans abortions after 15 weeks, for example, a woman in that circumstance has the option to travel to a state allowing such abortions.

But that also allows those who oppose abortion to find, if they so desire, a region of the union where they wish to reside because that community figures to better align with their values. It is the definition of civilized freedom.

— Bob Cunningham, Cherry Valley

 

Ukraine aid and defying congressional isolationists

I am glad to see Speaker Johnson defy the isolationists in the Republican Party and bring Ukraine aid up for a vote in the House (April 19).

However, I would have liked to seen language in the bill that would have required President Biden and his military team provide a strategy to help Ukraine defeat Russia rather than simply maintain the status quo. Give Ukraine the tools they need to win or concede defeat. Biden’s indecisive incrementalism costs money and lives, and the only upside is he doesn’t upset Mr. Putin too much. As the saying goes, “%$&# or get off the pot.”

— Tom Fournier, Rolling Hills Estates

 

Newport Beach Public Library and the parents

Re “Melissa moved to teen book section” (April 17):

If you parents don’t want your children to read these supposed books that “will rob them of their innocence” then go to the library with your child and pick out their books.

What you’re doing is censorship. You’re censoring other viewpoints that don’t align with yours.  Most of these books supposedly “robbing your child of his/her innocence” are minority/LBGTQ+A writers and other marginalized voices that need to be heard. What are you afraid of? Books bans/censorship have no place in our democracy.

— Susan L. Petrella, Fullerton

More in Letters to the editor